News Article

Caleb Buahin, Utah State University, Research Assistant

Water touches everything. Farms, households, businesses, and nature all depend on water – and each of these also affects how water reaches the other entities that depend on it. As society makes greater demands on Utah’s water resources, scientists increasingly are asked to predict how the natural water cycle and our engineered water systems will respond to pressures such as population growth and climate change. What must Utah do to adapt to changes in snowfall or stream flows? How can we meet the needs of a population that could double in 40 years?

To make these predictions and begin to work toward solutions, scientists use mathematical “models” that account for the various factors that influence water flows and uses. These models – actually sophisticated computer programs – must be complex enough to describe how scientists believe that natural and built water systems behave, yet simplified enough that they can be useful to decision makers who must make choices with data that may be limited or incomplete. These data, called input variables, are processed in mathematical equations to predict the consequences for desired outputs, i.e., the products and services that society and nature need from water. For instance, a hydrologic model might take in data on rain and snowfall, air temperature, solar radiation, etc., as input variables to produce outputs such as river flows, evaporation, and plant uptake.

Figure 1: Simplified Representation of a Mathematical Mode

Scientists who study different domains of the water system develop unique models that can answer the questions that matter to them. For example, a hydrologist may want to predict how stream flows will decrease over the summer after the snow melts, while an industrial engineer might want to predict how a new technology can reduce the amount of water needed daily to cool an electrical plant. Their respective models both rely on information about water availability and desired outputs, but they probably won’t account for all of the factors that are part of the other’s model. To answer the larger questions about how Utah can respond to changes in water supply and demand, more holistic models are needed that cover multiple domains of the water system.

That’s the problem Caleb Buahin is working on. Caleb, a postdoctoral researcher with the iUTAH project at Utah State University, has developed a flexible software framework called HydroCouple (Figure 2) that allows scientists to bring together models from different domains and scientific disciplines. This approach, called component-based modeling, allows for the communication and exchange of information during calculations. It allows scientists to test and refine hypotheses about how water systems behave by experimenting with different models using the same framework.

Figure 2: Software Framework Developed for Coupling Models

Caleb’s current work involves coupling together models that simulate the natural and built portions of urban water systems. By working with the City of Logan and using aquatic and climate data from iUTAH’s Gradients Along Mountain to Urban Transitions (GAMUT) network, he is able to examine present and future water capacity related to the cities’ stormwater system. An example output from his work shows the interactions between the canal system and the engineered stormwater infrastructure.

By demonstrating how this framework can be useful for bringing together models and data for different aspects of Utah’s water system, Caleb is creating software tools and guidance that can help other researchers evaluate not just water systems but other natural resource systems. In so doing, scientists will be able to avoid the pitfalls of studying parts of a problem independently, without considering the important ways that different resources affect each other and our future.